Embedded Files
A LINK to the lab manual is coming soon. You can only access it with your e-mail address.
Publications
Here are publications from our lab:
Bloom, R. D., Kaseda, E. T.* Bitterman, J B.*, Namuhmuh, K.*, Gandelman, E. M.*, & Miller, S. A. (in press). From a distance: A model to onboard and support undergraduates doing research. Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research (SPUR). (pdf coming soon)
Feinstein, B. A., Khan, A.*, Chang, C. J., & Miller, S. A. (2023). Use of the Heterosexist Harassment, Rejection, and Discrimination Scale with different sexual orientation, gender, and racial/ethnic groups: An examination of measurement invariance. Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231156135. (pdf; supplemental materials)
Bate, G.*, Buscemi, J., Tran, S. T., Greenley, R. N., & Miller, S. A. (in press - 2023). Salivary cortisol levels across tripartite dimensions of anxiety and depression in emerging adults. Biological Psychology, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108469. (pdf)
Kaseda, E. T., Graupman, E. E., Vincent, S., Faith, R., Howe, M. M., Dykins, M., Beussink, C. N., Khan, A.*, Grotkowski, K.*, & Miller, S. A. (2023). Statistical consulting in the healthcare professions: A model of student-led consulting services. Stat, 11(1). doi: 10.1002/sta4.498 (pdf, appendix)
Leib*, S. I.*, Miller, S. A., & Chin, E. (2023). Latent structure of working memory and emotion regulation in pediatric ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 29(4), 644-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2022.2107626. (pdf)
Gandelman, E. M.,* Miller, S. A., & Back, S. E. (2022). Imaginal exposure processing during COPE therapy: Examination of linguistic markers of cohesiveness. Journal of Traumatic Stress. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.22786 (pdf)
Obert, G. T.*, & Miller, S. A. (2021). The net worth of networks and extraversion: Examining personality structure through network models. Personality and Individual Differences, 181. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111039. (pdf)
Reed, B. W.*, Segal, N. L., & Miller, S. A. (2021). Evolutionary perspective on decreases in grief intensity for deceased twin and non-twin relatives: An update. Personality and Individual Differences, 178, xxx - yyy. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110822. (pdf)
Leib, S. I.*, Faith, E. C.*, Vincent, S. R.*, & Miller, S. A. (2021). Police interactions, perceived discrimination, and longitudinal changes in depression in African Americans. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 40(1), 27-45. doi: 10.1521/jscp.2021.40.1.27 (link; pdf)
Tran, S. T., Grotkowski, K. G.*, Miller, S. A., Reed, B. W.*, Koven, M. L., Buscemi, J., & Greenley, R. N. (2021). Hassles predict physical health complaints in undergraduate students: A dynamic structural equation model analysis of daily diary data. Psychology and Health. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1800010. (pdf)
Reed, B. W.*, Miller, S. A., Bobak, T. J., Steven, E., & Jason, L. A. (2020). The experience of smoking in recovery settings: An ecological momentary assessment pilot study. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions. doi: 10.1080/1533256X.2020.1710080. (pdf)
Grotkowski, K.*, & Miller, S. A. (2019). Optimists or optimistic: Replication of a taxometric study on optimism. Journal of Research in Personality, 82. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103854. (pdf, link, OSF)
Miller, S. A., & Grotkowski, K.* (2018). Physiological hyperarousal (2018). In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.). Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_453-1. (pdf, link)
Fowler, D.*, Weber, E.*, Klappa, S.P.*, & Miller, S.A. (2017). Replicating future orientation: Investigating hope, optimism, and their subscales through replication and expansion. Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 22-28. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.010 (pdf)
Conferences in 2023-2024
Here are conferences at which laboratory members and Steve have presented during the 2022-2023 school year:
Anderson, K. M.*, & Miller, S. A. (2024, May). Lawyer drinking behaviors: Nuances revealed by Classification and Regression Tree analysis. Poster accepted at the 2024 Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science. San Francisco, California.
Bahrke, J.*, Tran, S. T., Buscemi, J., Greenley, R. N., & Miller, S. A. (2024, May). Chronic mental health conditions and sleep efficiency: A variability investigation Poster accepted at the 2024 Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science. San Francisco, California.
Bate, G.*, Bahrke, J.*, Buscemi, J., Lampert-Olkin, S., Greenley, R. N., Schneider, K., Tran, S. T., & Miller, S. A. (2024, May). A latent variable model does not capture actigraph-assessed sleep quality indices. Poster accepted at the 2024 Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science. San Francisco, California.
Khan, A.*, Miller, S. A., Feinstein, B., & Kandula, N. (2024, May). Evaluating the STAI and CES-D show small differences in measurement properties between ethnocultural groups in the U.S. Poster accepted at the 2024 Annual Convention of the Association for Psychological Science. San Francisco, California.
Brieman, C. L.*, Bate, G.*, Anderson, K.*, Miller, S. A., & Kosson, D. S. (2024, May). Psychopathic traits in males predict post traumatic stress disorder symptoms in romantic partners. Symposium talk accepted at the 2024 Biennial Conference of the Society for the Scientific Study of Psychopathy. Cyprus.
Bahrke, J.*, Greenley, R. N., Tran, S., Buscemi, S., & Miller, S. A (2024, April). Chronic health conditions and sleep fragmentation: A variability investigation. Poster accepted at the 96th Annual Midwestern Psychological Association Conference. Chicago, Illinois.
Tucker is no ordinary lab animal (actually, he's never been IN the lab). However, he's helped us out with our models. There's debate as to whether his name comes from his ear often being tucked down or is in honor of Ledyard R Tucker. The Tucker-Lewis Index (aka, the Non-Normed Fit Index) is:
χ2/df(Null Model) - χ2/df(Proposed Model)
_________________________________
χ2/df(Null Model) - 1
George Bate, M.S. is a sixth year Clinical Psychology Ph.D. student at RFUMS. He earned his B.S. in Psychology from Loyola University Chicago and his A.A. from Oakton Community College. Before working in the Personality and Emotion Research Lab, he worked as a research assistant in Dr. Maryse Richards’ Risk and Resilience Lab and in Dr. Scott Tindale’s Group Decision-Making Lab at Loyola University Chicago. George has been published by Oxford University Press and in Eye on Psi Chi and Inquires Journal. His research interests include risk factors for anxiety and depression in marginalized populations and the conceptualization of anxiety and depressive symptoms using novel statistical methodology. In the future, George aims to conduct clinically relevant research regarding anxiety and depression and apply this research in a clinical setting. A copy of his CV is here. He has successfully defended his dissertation and is a clinical psychology intern at Captain James H. Lovell Federal Health Care Center.
Aaminah Khan, HBSc., M.S. is a fifth year as a Clinical Psychology Ph.D. student at RFUMS in Fall 2020. She earned an Honors Bachelor of Science degree at the University of Toronto with a Specialist in Psychology and a minor in Professional Writing and Communication. She worked as a Research Assistant in the Self-Knowledge and Interpersonal Perception Lab and the Regulatory and Affective Dynamics Lab at the University of Toronto. She is interested in the emotional experience of individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds who face mental illness. She is also interested in how to adapt psychotherapies to meet the needs of individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds. She is currently working as a Research Assistant at Punjabi Community Health Services on an innovative nationwide study being conducted by the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) to create a culturally adapted Cognitive Behavior Therapy for South Asians in Canada. Her CV may be found here.
Jesse Bahrke, M.S., is a third-year student in the Clinical Psychology doctoral program at Rosalind Franklin University. He graduated from University of Illinois with a bachelor's degree in Philosophy, and from Rosalind Franklin with a master's degree in clinical counseling. Current research interests include the role of technology in understanding human emotion, particularly for those with psychological disorders. Jesse also presented findings during the APS Conference in 2022. Jesse has 10+ years of experience in the field of health and fitness, and is currently a licensed professional counselor working in private practice. A copy of his CV is here.
Kristen Anderson, J.D., M.S. is a first-year Ph.D. student in RFUMS’s clinical psychology program. In 2024, she completed an M.S. in clinical counseling at RFUMS. She is interested in studying substance use, mental health, and wellness within the legal profession. Kristen is a practicing attorney with over 15 years’ experience in antitrust litigation and also maintains an active pro bono immigration practice representing refugees seeking asylum. She has been nominated by her peers as a Super Lawyer® every year from 2014-2022 and has three times received the American Antitrust Institute’s annual award for Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Law Practice. Kristen has also authored numerous legal publications and is frequently invited to speak on topics related to antitrust, class actions, and diversity, equity, and inclusion in the legal profession. She previously served in the leadership of the American Bar Association, Antitrust Section as Vice Chair of the Trial Practice and Books & Treatises Committees. Kristen is also a licensed yoga teacher and teaches yoga at RFUMS. She received her bachelor of arts in philosophy from St. Louis University (2003) and her juris doctor from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law (2006). During law school, Kristen served as an intern to Justice Katheryn M. Werdegar (ret.) of the California Supreme Court. She also interned at U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (San Francisco) and served as research assistant to Professor James R. McCall (ret.). She is licensed to practice law in California, the District of Columbia, New York, and Illinois. A copy of her CV may be found here.
Alex Schleicher is a second-year student in RFUMS’s clinical counseling master’s program on the research track. He is interested in furthering research into Educational and Developmental psychology, as he finds many of the theories that exist very limiting in scope and flexibility. Besides that, Alex wants to see how far he can apply game design theory into scientific research, in order to develop new methods for testing within psychology. A copy of his CV is coming soon.
Joshua Armstrong is a second-year student in RFUMS’s clinical counseling master’s program on the research track. He is interested in studying the effects personality traits have on one’s mental health outcomes, resilience to trauma, and ability to overcome stress. Though a rather broad interest, he hopes to apply this research to the ever-expanding field of space science. Joshua holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Augustana College in Rock Island (2018) with a double major in Communication Studies and Political Science. He wrote his senior thesis on Brazil’s judicial system while studying abroad in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. Prior to graduation, he also worked at the American Bar Association in Washington, D.C. as a legislative policy analyst in the ABA’s governmental affairs office. In 2020, Joshua pursued his post-baccalaureate in preclinical counseling from Northwestern University (2022). Joshua aims to pursue a doctorate in clinical psychology following the completion of his master’s degree. A copy of his CV is coming soon.
This could be you! I will consider taking an individual to pursuit graduate training in clinical psychology at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science to be Research Assistants in the Personality and Emotion Research Laboratory staring in the Fall of 2026. Knowledge of contemporary personality and emotion theory and research, statistics, and/or computer programming is helpful. If you're interested, please contact me.
Below, you'll find stats resources from my old web page
Below, you'll find stats resources from my old web page
Marley Watkins's programs
MBESS (Methods for Behavioral, Educational, and Social Sciences) in R
Ωnyx, a graphical interface for structural equation modeling
PANGEA (Power ANalysis for GEneral Anova Designs)
Psych package in R (Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research)
SEMNET, the structural equation modeling listserv
Taxometrics code in R
Factor Analysis Materials
Michael Browne's CEFA Program (and others)
Parallel Analysis in SPSS (and other # of factors decision measures)
HARKing
Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., Gould, W. R., & Cherry, S. (2001). Concerns about finding effects that are actually spurious. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 29, 311–316. (pdf)
Bosco, F. A., Aguinis, H., Field, J. G., Pierce, C. A., & Dalton, D. R. (in press). HARKing’s threat to organizational research: Evidence from primary and meta-analytic sources. Personnel Psychology. (pdf)
Gardner, M. R. (1982). Predicting novel facts. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 33, 1-15. (pdf)
Harker, D. (2008). On the predilections for predictions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59, 429-453. (pdf)
Hitchcock, C., & Sober, E. (2004). Prediction versus accommodation and the risk of overfitting. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 1-34. (pdf)
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2(3), 196-217. (pdf)
Kerr, N. L. (2011). HARK! A herald sings…but who’s listening? In R. M. Arkin (Ed.), Most Underappreciated: 50 Prominent Social Psychologists Talk About Hidden Gems. (pp. 126-131). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. (pdf)
Leung, K. (2011). Presenting post hoc hypotheses as a priori: Ethical and theoretical issues. Management and Organization Review, 7, 471-479. (pdf)
Lipton, P. (2001). Inference to the best explanation. In W. H. Newton-Smith (Ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Science (pp. 184-193). Walden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. (pdf)
Lipton, P. (2005). Testing hypotheses: Prediction and prejudice. Science, 307, 219-221. (pdf)
Roese, N. J., & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Hindsight bias. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(5), 411-426.(pdf)
Simon, H. A. (1955). Prediction and hindsight as confirmatory science. Philosophy of Science, 22, 227-230. (pdf)
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2011). Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 426–432. (pdf)
Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632-638. (pdf)
White, R. (2003). The epistemic advantage of prediction over accommodation. Mind, 112, 653-683. (pdf)
John Ioannidis's Work that I have Cited
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafó, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 365-376 (pdf) (errata pdf)
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nozek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013). Empirical evidence for low reproducibility indicates low pre-study odds. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 877. (pdf)
Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis J. P. A. (2013) U.S. studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 15031–15036. (pdf)
Chavalarias, D., Wallach, J. D., Li, A. H. T., & Ioannidis J. P. A. (2016). Evolution of reporting p values in the biomedical literature, 1990-2015. Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(11), 1141-1148. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (1998). Effect of the statistical significance of results on the time to completion and publication of randomized efficacy trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(4), 281–286. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2, e124. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Concentration of the most-cited papers in the scientific literature: Analysis of journal ecosystems. PLoS One, 1. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294, 218-228. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Trikalinos, T. A., & Zintzaras, E. (2006). Extreme between-study homogeneity in meta-analysis could offer useful insights. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(10), 1023-1032. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Patsopoulos, N. A., & Evangelou, E. (2007). Uncertainty in heterogeneity estimates in meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 335(7626), 914-916. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2008). Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology, 19, 640-648. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2011). More time for research: Fund people, not projects. Nature, 477, 429-531 (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2011). Excess significance bias in the literature on brain volume abnormalities. Archives of General Psychiatry, 68, 773–780. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Scientific communication is down at the moment, please check again later. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 267-270. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 645-654. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2013). Scientific inbreeding and same-team replication: Type D personality as an example. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 73(6), 408-410.(pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014). Estimates of the continuously publishing core in the scientific workforce. PLoS One, e101698. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014). How to make more published research true. PLoS Medicine, 11(10), e1001747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001747. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) Why most clinical research is not useful. PLoS Medicine, 13(6): e1002049. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049 (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Cappelleri, J. C., & Lau, J. (1998) Issues in comparisons between meta-analyses and large trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 1089–93. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Fanelli, D., Dunne, D. D., & Goodman, S. N. (2015). Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of research methods and practices. PLoS Biology, 13(10), e1002264. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Garber, A. M. (2012). Individualized cost effectiveness analysis. PLoS Medicine, 8(7), e1001058. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Greenland, S., Hlatky, M. A.,. Khoury, M. J., Macleod, M. R., Moher, D., Schultz, K. F., & Tibshirani, R. (2014). Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis. The Lancet, 383, 166-175. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Khoury, M. J. (2011). Improving validation practices in “omics” research. Science, 334, 1230–1232. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Lau, J. (2001). Evolution of treatment effects over time: empirical insight from recursive cumulative meta-analyses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 98(3), 831–6. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Panagiotou O. A. (2011). Comparison of effect sizes associated with biomarkers reported in highly cited individual articles and in subsequent meta-analyses. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305, 2200–2210. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Tarone, R., & McLaughlin, J. K. (2011). The false-positive to false-negative ratio in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology, 22(4), 450-456. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2005). Early extreme contradictory estimates may appear in published research: The Proteus phenomenon in molecular genetics research and randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58, 543-549. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings. Clinical Trials, 4, 245–253. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Trikalinos, T. A. (2007). The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: A large survey. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176, 1091-1096. (pdf)
Nicholson, J. M., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2012). Research grants: Conform and be funded. Nature, 492, 34-36. (pdf).
Smit, Y. Huibers, M. J. H., Ioannidis, J. P. A., van Dyck, R., van Tilburg, W., & Arntz, A. (2012). The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy - A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(2), 81-92. (pdf)
Tatsioni, A, Bonitsis, N. G., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Persistence of contradicted claims in the literature. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(21), 2517-2526. (pdf)
Young, N. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Al-Ubaydli, O. (2008). Why current publication practices may distort science. PLoS Medicine, 5, 1418-1422. (pdf)
Latent Variable Interactions and Nonlinear Effects
Bauer, D.J., Baldasaro, R. & Gottfredson, N.C. (2012). Diagnostic procedures for detecting nonlinear relationships between latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19, 157-177. (pdf)
Kelava, A., Moosbrugger, H., Dimitruk, P., & Schermelleh-Engel, K. (2008). Multicollinearity and MSEM for moderation missing constraints: A comparison of three approaches for the analysis of latent nonlinear effects. Methodology, 4, 51-66. (pdf)
Kelava, A., Werner, C., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., Cham, H., Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (2011). Advanced nonlinear structural equation modeling: Theoretical properties and empirical application of the LMS and QML estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 465-491. (pdf)
Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201-210. (pdf)
Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. (2007). Quasi-maximum likelihood of structural equation modeling with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 647- 673. (pdf)
Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 497-519. (pdf)
Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K.-T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275-300. (pdf)
Moosbrugger, H., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Kelava, A., & Klein, A. G. (2009). Testing multiple nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling: A comparison of alternative estimation approaches. In T. Teo & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Structural equation modeling in educational research: Concepts and applications (pp. 103-135). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. (pdf)
Pek, J., Sterba, S.K., Kok, B.E. & Bauer, D.J. (2009). Estimating and visualizing nonlinear relations among latent variables: A semiparametric approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 407-436. (pdf)
Steinmetz, H., Davidov, E., & Schmidt, P. (2011). Three approaches to estimate latent interaction effects: Intention and perceived behavioral control in the theory of planned behavior. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(1), 95-110. (pdf)
Longitudinal Analysis with Changing Scales
Edwards, M.C., & Wirth, R.J. (2009). Measurement and the study of change. Research in Human Development, 6, 74-96 . (pdf)
McArdle, J. J., Grimm, K. J., Hamagami, F., Bowles, R. P., & Meredith, W. (2009). Modeling life-span growth curves of cognition using longitudinal data with multiple samples and changing scales of measurement. Psychological Methods, 14(2), 126-149. (pdf)
Pettit, G. S., Keiley, M. K., Laird, R. D., Bates, R. D., & Dodge, K. A. (2007) Predicting the developmental course of mother-reported monitoring across childhood and adolescence from early practice parenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 206-217. (pdf) (Mplus slides)
Neuroscience Statistics
Aarts, E., Verhage, M., Veenvliet, J. V., Dolan, C. V., & van der Sluis, S. (2014). A solution to dependency: Using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data. Nature Neuroscience, 17(4), 491-496. (pdf)
Bennett, C. A., Baird, A. A., Miller, M. B., & Wolford, G. L. (2009). Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: An argument for multiple comparisons correction. Poster. (pdf)
Bennett, C. A., Baird, A. A., Miller, M. B., & Wolford, G. L. (2009). Neural correlates of interspecies perspective taking in the post-mortem Atlantic Salmon: An argument for proper multiple comparisons correction. Journal of Serendipitous and Unexpected Results, 1(1), 1-5. (pdf)
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafó, M. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 365-376 (pdf) (errata pdf)
Kim, J., Zhu, W., Chang, L., Bentler, P., & Ernst, T. (2007). Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 85-93. (pdf)
Nieuwenhuis, S., Forstmann, B. U., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011). Erroneous analysis of interactions in neuroscience: A problem of significance. Nature Neuroscience, 14(9), 1105-1107. (pdf)
Voodoo Correlations
Diener, E. (2009). Editor's introduction to Vul et al. (2009) and comments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 272-273. (pdf)
Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 274-290. (pdf)
Nichols, T. E.. & Poline, J.-B. (2009). Commentary on Vul et al.'s (2009) "Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition." Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 291-293. (pdf)
Yarkoni, T. (2009). Big correlations in little studies: Inflated fMRI correlations reflect low statistical power -- Commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 294-298. (pdf)
Lieberman, M. T., Berkman, E. T., & Wager, T. D. (2009). Correlations in social neuroscience aren't voodoo: Commentary on Vul et al. (2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 299-307. (pdf)
Lazar, N. A. (2009) Discussion of "Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition" by Vul et al. (2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 308-309. (pdf)
Lindquist, M. A., & Gelman, A. (2009). Correlations and multiple comparisons in functional imagining: A statistical perspective (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 310-313. (pdf)
Barrett, L. F. (2009) Understanding the mind by measuring the braing: Lessons from measuring behavior (Commentary on Vul et al., 2009). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 314-318. (pdf)
Vul, E., Harris, C., Winkielman, P., & Pashler, H. (2009). Reply to comments on "Puzzingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(3), 319-324. (pdf)
Ricean Distribution Materials
Gudbjartsson, H., & Patz, S. (1995). The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 34(6), 910-914. (pdf)
Lauwers, L., Barbé, K., Van Moer, W., & Pintelon, R. (2009, May 5-7) Estimating the parameters of a Rice distribution: A Bayesian approach. Proceedings of the International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference. (pp. 114-117). Singapore. (pdf)
Rice, S. O. (1944). Mathematical analysis of random noise. Bell System Technical Journal, 23(3), 282-332. (pdf, scan)
Sijbers, J., den Dekker, A. J., Scheunders, P., & Van Dyck, D. (1998). Maximum likelihood estimation of Rician distribution parameters. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(3), 357-361. (pdf)
Sijbers, J., den Dekker, A. J., Van Dyck, D., & Raman, E. (1998, February 11-14). Estimation of signal and noise from Rician distributed data. Proceedings of of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Communications (pp. 140-142). Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain. (pdf)
Pilot Studies
Arain, M., Campbell, M. J., Cooper, C. L., & Lancaster, G. A. (2010). What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice or editorial policy. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 67. (pdf)
Arnold, D. M., Burns, K. E. A., Adhikari, N. K. J., Kho, M. E., Meade, M. O., & Cook, D. J. (2009). The design and interpretation of pilot trials in clinical research and critical care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 37, 1, S69-S74. (pdf)
Grimes, D. A., & Schultz, K. F. (2002). Descriptive studies: What they can and cannot do. The Lancet, 359(9301), 145-149. (pdf).
Kraemer, H.C., Mintz, J., Noda, A., Tinklenberg, J., & Yesavge, J.A. (2006). Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63, 484–489. (pdf)
Lancaster, G. A., Dodd, S., & Williamson, P. R. (2004).. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice.Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 10(2), 307-312. (pdf)
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011). The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(5), 626-629. (pdf)
Thabane, L., Ma, J., Chu, R., Cheng, J., Ismaila, A., Rios, L. P., Robson, R., Thabane, M., Giangregorio, L. & Goldsmith, C. H. (2010). A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 1. (pdf)
Replication Crisis (non-comprehensive, updated periodically):
Hanson, R. C. (1958). Evidence and procedure characteristics of "reliable" propositions in social science. American Journal of Sociology, 63(4), 357-370. (pdf)
Kahneman, D. (2014). A new etiquette for replication. Social Psychology, 45(4), 310-311. (pdf)
Nosek et al. (2015, June 26). Scientific standards: Promoting an open science research culture. Science, 348(6242),
1422-1425. (pdf) (Supplementary material)
Scientific Utopia
Psychological Inquiry, 2012
Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012), Scientific utopia: I. Opening scientific communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 217-243. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.692215 (pdf)
Adolph, K. E., Gilmore, R. O., Freeman, C., Sanderson, P., & Millman, D. (2012). Toward open behavioral science. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 244-247. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705133. (pdf)
Assendorpf, J. B. (2012). Does open scientific communication increase the quality of knowledge? Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 248-250. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.700578. (pdf)
Cirasella, J. (2012). A librarian's defense of the practical over the perfect in scholarly communication. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 251-252. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.706203. (pdf)
Cooper, J. (2012). Missteps on the road to a scientific utopia. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 253-255. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.704802. (pdf)
Crocker, J. (2012). Improving science by improving scientific communication: The view from the APA publication and communication board. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 256-257. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.702371. (pdf)
Dumming, D. (2012). What do we really want? Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 258-260. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.704803. (pdf)
Fendley, P. (2012). Seeking the road to utopia. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 261-262. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705130. (pdf)
Giner-Sorolla, R. (2012). Will we march to utopia, or be dragged there? Past failures and hopes for publishing our science. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 263-266. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.706506. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J. P. (2012). Scientific communication is down at the moment, please check again later. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 267-270. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.699427. (pdf)
Iyer, R., & Graham, J. (2012). Leveraging the wisdom of crowds in a data-rich utopia. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 271-273. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705244. (pdf)
King, L. A. (2012). A dinosaur comments on the coming apocalypse: Does anybody else see that asteroid? Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 274-276. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.704804. (pdf)
Lilienfeld, C. O. (2012). Scientific utopia or scientific dystopia? Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 277-280. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.704807. (pdf)
Mooneyham, B. W., Franklin, M. S., Mrazek, M. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Moderinzing science: Comments on Nosek and Bar-Anan (2012). Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 281-284. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705246. (pdf)
Moore, D. A., & Tenney, E. R. (2012). Cheaper and better: Why scientific advancement demands the more to open access publishing. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 285-286. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705247. (pdf)
Mudditt, A., & Hogg, M. A. (2012). Scientific utopia: That which cannot exist? Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 287-290. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.704855. (pdf)
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J. P., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). Let's publish fewer papers. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 291-293. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705245. (pdf)
Petty, R. E. (2012). Let's try and fix the current publishing system before making dramatic changes. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 294-297. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.705132. (pdf)
Reis, H. T. (2012). The future of scientific publication in psychology: Utopias and dystopias. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 298-300. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.704854. (pdf)
Saxe, R. (2012). How should we manage peer review and why? Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 301-302. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.707635. (pdf)
Spellman, B. A. (2012). Scientific utopia ... or too much information? Comment on Nosek and Bar-Anan. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 303-304. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.701161. (pdf)
Yarkoni, T. (2012). Beginning at Nosek and Bar-Anan's end: Let's put open evaluation first. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 305-307. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.706204. (pdf)
Nosek, B. A., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2012). Scientific communication is changing and scientists should lead the way. Psychological Inquiry, 23(3), 308-314. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2012.717907.(pdf)
Other Readings
Nosek, B. A., Spies, J. R., & Motyl, M. (2012). Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 615-631. doi: 10.1177/1745691612459058. (pdf)
Miguel, E., Camerer, C., Casey, K., Cohen, J., Esterling, K. M., Gerber, A., Glennerster, R., Green, D. P., Humphreys, M., Imbens, G., Laitin, D., Madon, T., Nelson, L., Nosek, B. A., Peterson, N., Sedlmayer, R., Simmons, J. P., Simonsohn, U., & van der Laan, M. (2014). Promoting transparency in social science research. Science, 343(6166). 30-31.(pdf)
Links
Other Readings
Articles I've Told At Least Ten People to Read
De Groot, A. D. (1956/2014). The meaning of "significance" for different types of research. Translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Roger Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas. Acta Psychologica, 148, 188-194. (pdf)
Funder, D. C, Levine, J. M., Mackie, D. M., Morf, C. C, Vazire, S., & West, S. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18, 3 - 12 (pdf)
Gelman, A., & Stern, H. (2006). The difference between "significant" and "not significant" is not itself statistically significant. The American Statistician, 60(4), 328-331. (pdf)
Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. (pdf)
Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research, 70(3, part 1), 151-159. (pdf)
MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7, 19-40. (pdf)
Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., & Fiedler, K. (2014). Research practices that can prevent an inflation of false-positive rates. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 107-118. (pdf)
Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276-1284. (pdf)
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, DD., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012).An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632-638. (pdf)
Multilevel Structural Equation Modeling References (a page with a lot of references)
Network Analysis References
Borsboom, D. (2008). Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64, 1089-1108. (pdf)
Borsboom, D., & Cramer, A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 91-121. (pdf)
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Schmittman, V. D., Epskamp, S., & Waldrop, L. K. (2011). The small world of psychopathology. PLOS ONE, 6(11), e27407. (pdf)
Bringham, L. F., Vissers, N., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Kuppens, P., Peeters, F., Borsboom, D., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2013). A network approach to psychopathology: New insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLOS ONE, 8(4), e60188 (pdf)
Cramer, A. O. J., .Borsboom, D., Aggen, S. H., & Kendler, K. S. (2012). The pathoplasticity of dysphoric episodes. Differential impact of stressful life events on the pattern of depressive symptom inter-correlations. Psychological Medicine, 42(5), 957-965. (pdf)
Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., van der Maas, H., & Borsboom, D. (2010). Comorbidity: A network perspective. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 137-193.(pdf)
Costantini, G., Epskamp, S., Borsboom, D., Perugini, M, Mõttus, R., Waldorp, L. J., & Cramer, A. O. J. (in press). State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R. Journal of Research in Personality. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.003. (pdf)
Epskamp, S., Cramer, A.O.J., Waldorp, L.J., Schmittmann, V.D. and Borsboom, D. (2012) qgraph: Network Visualizations of Relationshipsin Psychometric Data.Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1-18. (pdf)
Frewen, P. A., Scmittman, V. D., Bringmann, L. F., & Borsboom, D. (2013). Perceived causal relations between anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and depression: Extension to moderation, mediation, and network analysis. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 4, 20656. (pdf)
Schmittman, V. D., Cramer, A. O. J., Waldorp, L. J., Epskamp, S., Kievit, R. A., and Borsboom, D. (2011). Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology, 31(1), 43-53. (pdf)
van Borkulo, C. D, Borsboom, D., Epskamp, S., Blanken, T. F., Boschloo, L., Schoevers, R. A., & Waldorp, L. J. (2014).A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Scientific Reports, 4, 5918, DOI: 10.1038/srep05918 (pdf)
The Psychosystems Project link
A first course in network analysis
A second course in network analysis
Software Packages
More to come...
Not exactly statistical per se, but... Paul Meehl related articles
Meehl's James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award from the American Psychological Society (now Association for Psychological Science) delivered May 23, 1998, Washington, D.C., entitled "The Power of Quantitative Thinking" (pdf)
"In appreciation of" link
Applied and Preventive Psychology, Volume 11, Issue 1 (2004) [in honor of Meehl]
Paul Meehl’s search for the optimal epistemology for the behavioral and social sciences (pdf)
Paul Meehl and the evolution of statistical methods in psychology (pdf)
The myth of open concepts: Meehl’s analysis of construct meaning versus black box essentialism (pdf)
Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, (Sir) Paul, and the human element in the progress of soft psychology (pdf)
Comment on “Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology” (pdf)
Falsification and the protective belt surrounding entity-postulating theories (pdf)
Taking theoretical risks in a world of directional predictions (pdf)
Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology (pdf)
Another quasi-30 years of slow progress (pdf)
The philosophical legacy of Meehl (1978): confirmation theory, theory quality, and scientific epistemology (pdf)
Paul Everett Meehl (pdf)
A few dissents from a magnificent piece of work (pdf)
Tabular asterisks, Paul Meehl, and looking at the data (pdf)
Commentary on Meehl (pdf)
Constructs, operational definition, and operational analysis (pdf)
Commentary on Meehl’s theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology (pdf)
The fallacy of the null hypothesis in soft psychology (pdf)
Statistical significance testing, construct validity, and clinical versus actuarial judgment: an interesting (seeming) paradox (pdf)
Psychological Methods, Volume 7, Issue 3 (2002)
The Path Analysis Controversy: A new statistical approach to strong appraisal of verisimilitude (pdf)
Comments on the Meehl-Waller (2002) procedure for appraisal of path analysis models (pdf)
The priority of just-identified, recursive models (pdf)
Commentary on Meehl and Waller's (2002) Path Analysis and Verisimilitude (pdf)
Risky tests, verisimilitude, and path analysis (pdf)
Psychological Inquiry, Volume 1, Issue 2 (1990)
Editor's Note (pdf)
Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It (pdf)
The Meehilan Corroboration-Verisimilitude Theory of Science (pdf)
In Defense of Popperian Falsification (pdf)
Theory Corroboration and Football: Measuring Progress (pdf)
Judging Results and Theories (pdf)
View of a Supportive Empiricist (pdf)
A Trivial Disagreement? (pdf)
The Compleat Falsifier (pdf)
Clinical Versus Statistical Theory Appraisal (pdf)
Thoughts on Meehl's Vision of Psychological Research for the Future (pdf)
Can Theory Appraisal Be Quantified? (pdf)
The Limits of Knowledge: Bayesian Pragmatism Versus a Lakatosian Defense (pdf)
Meehl on Theory Appraisal (pdf)
Author's Response (pdf)
Meehl's Cliometric Metatheory Book (that was never published) in three pieces
Meehl, P. E. (1992) Cliometric metatheory: The actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science. Psychological Reports, 71, 339-467. (pdf)
Meehl, P. E. (2002) Cliometric metatheory II: Criteria scientists use in theory appraisal and why it is rational to do so. Psychological Reports, 91, 339-404. (pdf)
Meehl,P. E. (2004) Cliometric metatheory III: Peircean consensus, verisimilitude, and asymptotic method. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 55, 615-643 (pdf)
Taxometrics
The Original Psychiatry Reports
Meehl, P. E. (1965). Detecting latent clinical taxa by fallible quantitative indicators lacking an accepted criterion (Report No. PR-65-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Meehl, P. E. (1968). Detecting latent clinical taxa, II: A simplified procedure, some additional hitmax cut locators, a single-indicator method, and miscellaneous theorems (Report No. PR-68-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry (link)
Meehl, P. E., Lykken, D. T., Burdick, M. R., & Schoener, G. R. (1969). Identifying latent clinical taxa, III. An empirical trial of the normal single-indicator method, using MMPI Scale 5 to identify the sexes. (Report No. PR-69-1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Golden, R., & Meehl, P. E. (1973). Detecting latent clinical taxa, IV: Empirical study of the maximum covariance method and the normal minimum chi-square method, using three MMPI keys to identify the sexes (Report No. PR-73-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Golden, R., & Meehl, P. E. (1973). Detecting latent clinical taxa, V: A Monte Carlo study of the maximum covariance method and associated consistency tests (Report No. PR-73-3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Golden, R., Tyan, S., & Meehl, P. E. (1974). Detecting latent clinical taxa, VI: Analytical development and empirical trials of the consistency hurdles theory (Report No. PR-74-4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Golden, R., Tyan, S., & Meehl, P. E. (1974). Detecting latent clinical taxa, VII: Maximum likelihood solution and empirical and artificial data trials of the multi-indicator multi-taxonomic class normal theory (Report No. PR-74-5). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Golden, R., & Meehl, P. E. (1974). Detecting latent clinical taxa, VIII: A preliminary study in the detection of the schizoid taxon using MMPI items as indicators (Report No. PR-74-6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Golden, R., Tyan, S., & Meehl, P. E. (1974). Detecting latent clinical taxa, IX: A Monte Carlo method for testing taxometric theories (Report No. PR-74-7). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Research Laboratories of the Department of Psychiatry. (link)
Will Grove's Taxometrics Page
Paul Meehl's Taxometrics Page
John Ruscio's Taxometrics Page
Taxometrics Resources (new page)
Selected Support Letters/Biosketches
W. LaVome Robinson Support Letter - “Preventing Substance Abuse in African American Adolescents Emerging to Adulthood”
Rachel Neff Greenley Support Letter (old version) - “Promoting Self-Management Skills in Older Adolescents and Young Adults with IBD”
W. LaVome Robinson Support Letter - "Social Ecology and the Prevention of Suicide and Aggression in African American youth"
Chisina Kapungu Support Letter - Mentored Research Scientist Award
NIH Biosketch (old format)
NIH Biosketch (new format)
Google Sites
Report abuse